El Tribunal Supremo insiste en la no intercambiabilidad de las potestades de calificación y de declaración de existencia de simulación o conflicto en la aplicación de la Norma Tributaria: STS de 27 de mayo de 2024, REC. núm. 916/2024

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48297/20p0m736

Keywords:

Anti-avoidance clauses, qualification, simulation, conflict in the application of tax regulations, VAT, temporary transfer of federative rights of football players

Abstract

The analysis of the treatment for VAT purposes of the temporary transfer of federative rights of football players carried out in  Judgment no. 916/2024 takes up a doctrine established by the Supreme Court since 2020. Cases such as the one examined in this  ruling show a recurrent claim by the Tax Administration, in the exercise of its powers to apply taxes, to resort indistinctly to any of  the three anti-avoidance mechanisms provided for in the General Tax Law (classification, simulation and conflict in the application of  the rule). To put a stop to this trend, the need for a clear delimitation of these mechanisms, designed to provide a different  response to disparate factual situations, is reaffirmed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jesús Ramos Prieto

    Catedrático de Derecho Financiero y Tributario
    Universidad Pablo de Olavide de Sevilla
    Sevilla
    (España)
    Miembro de AEDAF

Published

30/09/2024

Issue

Section

Análisis de jurisprudencia nacional y doctrina administrativa

How to Cite

Ramos Prieto, J. (2024). El Tribunal Supremo insiste en la no intercambiabilidad de las potestades de calificación y de declaración de existencia de simulación o conflicto en la aplicación de la Norma Tributaria: STS de 27 de mayo de 2024, REC. núm. 916/2024. Technical Tax Journal, 3(146), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.48297/20p0m736