El Tribunal Supremo insiste en la no intercambiabilidad de las potestades de calificación y de declaración de existencia de simulación o conflicto en la aplicación de la Norma Tributaria: STS de 27 de mayo de 2024, REC. núm. 916/2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48297/20p0m736Keywords:
Anti-avoidance clauses, qualification, simulation, conflict in the application of tax regulations, VAT, temporary transfer of federative rights of football playersAbstract
The analysis of the treatment for VAT purposes of the temporary transfer of federative rights of football players carried out in Judgment no. 916/2024 takes up a doctrine established by the Supreme Court since 2020. Cases such as the one examined in this ruling show a recurrent claim by the Tax Administration, in the exercise of its powers to apply taxes, to resort indistinctly to any of the three anti-avoidance mechanisms provided for in the General Tax Law (classification, simulation and conflict in the application of the rule). To put a stop to this trend, the need for a clear delimitation of these mechanisms, designed to provide a different response to disparate factual situations, is reaffirmed.
